October 28, 2026
Engineers designing a multi-purpose sports venue with a warship-inspired exterior selected a space truss roof after comparing grid and cable-strut systems. The choice was driven by stiffness, maintenance demands and the need to preserve clean architectural lines across an irregular column grid that produces a maximum span of 76.1 meters.
The venue covers about 14,907 square meters and carries a Grade II structural safety rating with Category B seismic design. Its roof must balance appearance, structural performance and cost, so the design team initially evaluated three mainstream steel systems.
| Structural type | Main advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Grid structure | Simple load path, economical cost and convenient construction. | Dense members affect appearance; limited adaptability to hanging loads. |
| Cable-strut structure | Lightweight form, long span and strong architectural expression. | Sensitive to wind load; high interior clearance requirements; higher cost. |
| Space truss | Clean, flowing shape, high stiffness and easy maintenance. | Complex node fabrication and strict welding quality requirements. |
Because the roof has no suspended ceiling, the dense members of a grid structure would have disrupted the building’s warship-like appearance. A cable-strut system offered a lighter look, but its wind sensitivity raised the risk of bottom chord instability under wind suction, and adding self-weight to balance those loads would have reduced economic efficiency. The space truss ultimately prevailed because of its stiffness and simple lines.
The arena’s substructure uses an irregular column grid, which creates uneven main truss spans across the roof. To smooth the flow of forces, the design team introduced a transfer truss concept.
This arrangement allows the roof to handle varying span conditions without forcing a single structural pattern across the entire arena. It also keeps the primary force flow predictable as the roof meets the lower concrete structure.
To maintain a light visual profile, the design team limited the truss height to 3.2 meters, producing a maximum depth-to-span ratio of about 1/16. The member sections were also refined in detail, with nine different specifications used across the roof.
Chord sections were reduced from 245×16 mm to 121×6 mm, while web members range from 76×4 mm to 219×16 mm. Those choices support structural safety while making efficient use of material and keeping the roof form visually lean.